<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
        <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/styles/feed.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
<channel>
<title>nutmeg's blog</title>
<atom:link href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian</link>
<description>musings and rants</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-21T12:20:28+00:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net" />

<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2012/04/21/T12_06_28/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2012/04/21/T12_06_28/index.html</guid>
<title>balance sheet snowboarding season 2011/12</title>
<dc:date>2012-04-21T12:06:28+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> fun</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Finally a year with real snow again.</p>
<p>Winter started rather late this year, I was still hiking at above 2000m
end of November with <em>zero</em> snow there. First day of snowboarding was
December 21st. Starting from there we never had too little snow. At home we
topped out at 175cm, and had more than 125cm for a long time. Start of February
was very cold, I had to skip a good day of good weather as I got a tiny bit of
frostburn on my nose.  (1200m of descent was a little to much at below
-20&deg;C.) A very warm end of March/start of April neverless quickly killed
the snow here down at the bottom of the valley.  There is still lots of snow in
the mountains, although the ski-lifts have closed April 15th.</p>
<p>Judging from the number of snowboarding days the season was a bad one. It
started late and ended early (31st of March). In spring I simply need good
weather to have fun. - Cloudy nights are too warm, the slope does not
freeze properly, which is perfect only for breaking one's leg.</p>
<p>Nevertheless if I could choose between a repetition of 2010/11 or
2011/2012, I would always go for the latter. :-)</p>
<p>On a sidenote, my local hill has switched from www.hoehenmeter.com to
www.skiline.cc to provide statistical information.</p>
<p>Here is the balance sheet:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th></th><th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2006/04/22/T11_44_37/">2005/06</a></th>
<th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2007/04/09/T11_48_29/">2006/07</a></th>
<th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2008/04/06/T15_47_27/">2007/08</a></th>
<th><a href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2009/04/19/T11_57_35/">2008/09</a></th>
<th><a href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2010/04/24/T14_06_16/">2009/10</a></th>
<th><a href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/04/16/T11_31_52/">2010/11</a></th>
<th>2011/12</th>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>number of (partial) days</td><td>25</td><td>17</td><td>29</td><td>37</td><td>30</td><td>30</td><td>25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dam&uuml;ls</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>16</td><td>23</td><td>10</td>

</tr>
<tr>
<td>Diedamskopf</td><td>15</td><td>4</td><td>24</td><td>23</td><td>13</td><td>4</td><td>14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Warth/Schr&ouml;cken</td><td>0</td><td>3</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>3</td><td>1</td>

</tr>
<tr>
<td>total meters of
altitude</td><td>124634</td><td>74096</td><td>219936</td><td>226774</td><td>202089</td><td>203918</td><td>228588</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>highscore</td><td>10247m</td><td>8321m</td><td>12108m</td><td>11272m</td><td>11888m</td><td>10976m</td><td>13076m</td>

</tr>
<tr>
<td># of runs</td><td>309</td><td>189</td><td>503</td><td>551</td><td>462</td><td>449</td><td>516</td>
</tr>
</table>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/12/18/T07_34_49/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/12/18/T07_34_49/index.html</guid>
<title>GnuTLS 3.0.x in unstable</title>
<dc:date>2011-12-18T07:34:49+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>GnuTLS 3.0.x is finally available in unstable 
(<a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnutls28/news/20111214T163915Z.html">and squeeze</a>).
Please consider upgrading. (Development package: libgnutls28-dev)
</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/10/08/T12_31_06/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/10/08/T12_31_06/index.html</guid>
<title>exim 4.77 rc4 in experimental</title>
<dc:date>2011-10-08T12:31:06+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>exim 4.77 rc4 is available for testing in experimental. This release
contains an incompatible change. Exim no longer performs string expansion
on the second string of the match_* expansion conditions: "match_address",
"match_domain", "match_ip" and "match_local_part". Named lists can still be
used.</p>
<p>See
<a href="https://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20111003.122326.fbcf32b7.en.html">explanation
and rationale</a> on exim-announce mailing list.</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/09/24/T16_56_11/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/09/24/T16_56_11/index.html</guid>
<title>exim with support for TLS1.1 and TLS1.2</title>
<dc:date>2011-09-24T16:56:11+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I have just uploaded 
<a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/exim4/news/20110924T164721Z.html">exim4 4.76-4</a>
to experimental. Compared to 4.76-3 the only additions are
<a href="http://mid.gmane.org/20110924072352.GA77405%40redoubt.spodhuis.org">
the changes from upstream's gnutls_fixes branch</a>, making exim4 advertise
and use TLS1.1 or TLS1.2 if available.</p>
<p>We would appreciate some testing.</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/08/01/T17_11_25/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/08/01/T17_11_25/index.html</guid>
<title>down</title>
<dc:date>2011-08-01T17:11:25+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> life</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
This weekend I looked down.
<a href="/images/blog/2011-07-31-mittagsfluh1.jpeg">
<img src="/images/blog/2011-07-31-mittagsfluh1-s.jpeg" alt="there is the Bregenzer Ache"  style="border:none;" /></a>
</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/06/19/T12_19_36/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/06/19/T12_19_36/index.html</guid>
<title>pushing release goals</title>
<dc:date>2011-06-19T12:19:36+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the bad weather I have made some progress implementing
release-goal in my/our packages:</p>
<ul>
<li>I have <a href="http://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html">NMUed</a>
the last packages preventing me from dropping la files from gnutls and
gcrypt. (Luk seems to have taken care of many others.)</li>
<li>Both
<a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/libt/libtasn1-3/news/20110618T073213Z.html">
libtasn1-3</a> and 
<a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/libk/libksba/news/20110619T121804Z.html">
libksba</a> are multi-arch aware now.</li>
</ul>
<p>On a sidenote, please keep testing gnutls 2.12.7 (in experimental) to
prevent unwanted surprises
<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/630511">when we upload to
unstable</a>.</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/05/09/T18_00_26/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/05/09/T18_00_26/index.html</guid>
<title>Hotfix for CVE-2011-1764</title>
<dc:date>2011-05-09T18:00:26+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Since exim is currently stuck in the perl 5.12 transition it is a very
good idea to add "warn control = dkim_disable_verify" at the beginning
of the rcpt acl on systems running testing. This will prevent attacks
based on 
<a href="http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-1764">CVE-2011-1764</a>.
</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/04/16/T11_31_52/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/04/16/T11_31_52/index.html</guid>
<title>balance sheet snowboarding season 2010/11</title>
<dc:date>2011-04-16T11:31:52+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> fun</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This year we had very little snow again. Although winter started (too)
early (first snow on October 16th) we topped out at little over 50cm in Au
(in December). In a normal winter we should have 1m at least temporarily, and
2m is not a rare. Temperatures were high, too. I was usually wearing a layer
less than normally.  All this had me riding in Dam&uuml;ls most of time,
Diedamskopf only saw me in December, since they have little artificial snow,
and natural one was missing. Summer temperatures (20°C) at start of April cut
the season very short. My last snow day was on April 3rd. On the upside I
did not hurt myself this year (knock, knock) and the weather was good often.<p> 

<p>Here is the balance sheet:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<th></th><th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2006/04/22/T11_44_37/">2005/06</a></th>
<th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2007/04/09/T11_48_29/">2006/07</a></th>
<th><a href="/blog/debian/archives/2008/04/06/T15_47_27/">2007/08</a></th>
<th><a href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2009/04/19/T11_57_35/">2008/09</a></th>
<th><a href="http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2010/04/24/T14_06_16/">2009/10</a></th>
<th>2010/11</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>number of (partial) days</td><td>25</td><td>17</td><td>29</td><td>37</td><td>30</td><td>30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dam&uuml;ls</td><td>10</td><td>10</td><td>5</td><td>10</td><td>16</td><td>23</td>

</tr>
<tr>
<td>Diedamskopf</td><td>15</td><td>4</td><td>24</td><td>23</td><td>13</td><td>4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Warth/Schr&ouml;cken</td><td>0</td><td>3</td><td>0</td><td>4</td><td>1</td><td>3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>total meters of
altitude</td><td>124634</td><td>74096</td><td>219936</td><td>226774</td><td>202089</td><td>203918</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>highscore</td><td>10247m</td><td>8321m</td><td>12108m</td><td>11272m</td><td>11888m</td><td>10976m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td># of runs</td><td>309</td><td>189</td><td>503</td><td>551</td><td>462</td><td>449</td>
</tr>
</table>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/03/27/T17_53_35/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/03/27/T17_53_35/index.html</guid>
<title>GnuTLS 2.12.0 in experimental</title>
<dc:date>2011-03-27T17:53:35+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
I have
<a href="http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnutls26/news/20110327T091857Z.html">uploaded</a>
<a href="http://www.gnutls.org/">GnuTLS</a> 
<a href="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2011-03/msg00034.html">2.12.0</a> 
to experimental. Please test.
</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/02/20/T13_14_34/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2011/02/20/T13_14_34/index.html</guid>
<title>license incompatibilities</title>
<dc:date>2011-02-20T13:14:34+00:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Andreas Metzler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> debian</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.gnutls.org/">GnuTLS</a> has recently made
<a href="http://www.lysator.liu.se/~nisse/nettle/">Nettle</a> its prefered
crypto backend. I think Debian will need to continue to use
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/libgcrypt/">libgcrypt</a> for license
reasons. While GnuTLS+libgcrypt and its dependencies are LGPL-2.1+ nettle
itself is LGPL-2.1+, except for small GPL-2+ parts (serpent and blowfish). But
these are being replaced by LGPL-2.1+ implementations currently.
However nettle's public key library (libhogweed) uses and links against
the 
<a href="http://gmplib.org/">GNU Multiple Precision Arithmetic Library</a>
which is LGPL-3+.</p>
<p>Afaiui this is a deal-breaker, GPL-2 (<em>without the "any later
version" clause</em>) and (L)GPL-3 are
<a href="http://gplv3.fsf.org/dd3-faq">incompatible</a>. A nontrivial 
number of GnuTLS using applications and libraries are licensed (L)GPL-2. I
started checking but stopped at "j" after finding cherokee-1.0.20,
cluster-glue-1.0.7, cups-1.4.6, drizzle-2010.09.180, echoping-6.0.2,
elinks-0.12~pre5, gtk-vnc-0.4.2, inspircd-1.1.22+dfsg and
jd-2.8.1~beta110214.
</p>]]></description>

</item>
</channel>
</rss>

